Who's Taking Care of the Helpers? The Nonprofit Mental Health Crisis Donors Aren't Hearing About
Photo: Prof Flitwick, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
The Person Who Answered the Phone
Jamila Reeves spent six years as a case manager at a domestic violence shelter in Memphis. She loved the work — fiercely, completely. She also stopped sleeping around year four.
"You carry it home," she says. "You carry it everywhere. You're grocery shopping and you're thinking about the client who didn't show up for her appointment and whether she's okay. You're at your kid's school play and you're running through your case list in your head."
By the time she resigned, Jamila was experiencing what clinicians call secondary traumatic stress — a condition common among helping professionals who absorb the emotional weight of the people they serve. She wasn't lazy. She wasn't weak. She was depleted in a way that her organization, through no particular fault of its own, simply didn't have the resources to address.
"There was no EAP that covered enough sessions. No one checking on the staff. We were just supposed to be okay because the work was meaningful."
Jamila's story is not unusual. It is, in fact, becoming the norm.
A Sector in Crisis
The numbers are difficult to ignore. A 2023 survey conducted by the National Council of Nonprofits found that 74% of nonprofit organizations reported staffing shortages, with employee burnout cited as the leading driver of turnover. The sector is losing experienced workers faster than it can replace them — and the people leaving often carry years of irreplaceable institutional knowledge and community trust.
Dr. Simone Whitfield, a burnout specialist who works with social service organizations across the country, describes the situation bluntly.
"We are in a workforce crisis that is directly threatening the quality and continuity of services for the most vulnerable people in this country," she says. "And we're not talking about it loudly enough."
The reasons are structural and deeply frustrating. Nonprofits operate on tight margins. Program funding from grants typically can't be redirected toward staff wellness initiatives — many funders explicitly prohibit it. Administrative budgets are chronically underfunded. The result is a workforce that is, by design, under-resourced to care for itself.
And the people who suffer most from that gap? The clients those workers serve.
The Compassion Fatigue Cycle Nobody Wants to Admit
Here's the uncomfortable truth at the center of this conversation: when nonprofit workers burn out, programs degrade. Response times slow. Case quality drops. Clients fall through cracks that wouldn't exist with a fully staffed, adequately supported team.
This creates a cycle that's genuinely hard to break from the inside. Organizations are so focused on meeting immediate community needs that investing in staff wellness feels like a luxury — or worse, a distraction from the mission.
"The culture in a lot of these organizations is heroic sacrifice," says Dr. Whitfield. "And that culture is killing people's careers and, indirectly, limiting the help that reaches communities."
Frontline workers describe feeling guilty for struggling. Supervisors describe feeling powerless to help. Executive directors describe lying awake at night wondering how to keep the lights on, keep the staff, and keep serving people — all at once, on a shoestring.
Something has to give. And increasingly, advocates are arguing that the something needs to come from outside the organizations themselves.
What Donors Can Actually Do
This is where the conversation usually stalls. Donors hear about organizational dysfunction and feel helpless — or worse, skeptical. But there are concrete, meaningful ways that people who care about causes can directly support the humans doing the work.
Fund the unsexy stuff. One of the most impactful things a donor can do is designate gifts for operational or administrative costs — or better yet, give unrestricted funds that organizations can direct where they're most needed. Mental health benefits, supervision for frontline staff, and wellness programs almost never get funded by program grants. General operating support changes that.
Ask the right questions before you give. When evaluating a nonprofit, don't just ask about program outcomes. Ask: Does this organization offer mental health support to its staff? What's the average employee tenure? How do you support workers dealing with secondary trauma? Organizations that can answer these questions well are investing in sustainability. Those that can't may need encouragement — and funding — to start.
Advocate for better funder policies. If you give to community foundations, donor-advised funds, or larger institutional funders, you have a voice. Push for grant policies that allow — and even require — a percentage of funding to go toward staff wellness and organizational health. This is a growing movement in the philanthropic sector, and donor pressure accelerates it.
Give to capacity-building initiatives. Several national organizations, including the Nonprofit Finance Fund and local nonprofit associations in most major US cities, specifically fund capacity-building efforts — including staff training, mental health resources, and HR infrastructure. These aren't glamorous grants, but they're foundational.
Voices From the Frontline
Derek Saunders has worked in homeless services in Denver for eight years. He's one of the lucky ones — his organization recently secured a multi-year grant that included funding for an employee assistance program and monthly clinical supervision sessions for case managers.
"It's made a real difference," he says. "Not just for me, but for the people I work with. When you feel supported, you show up differently. You're more present. You catch things you might have missed when you were running on empty."
He's also clear about where that change came from: a donor who asked pointed questions during a site visit, then wrote a grant specifically designed to address what she heard.
"One person asking the right questions led to real structural change," Derek says. "Donors have more leverage than they think."
That's the thread running through every conversation on this topic. The sector's mental health crisis isn't inevitable. It's a funding and priority problem — which means it's a solvable problem, if the people with resources choose to redirect them.
Connecting Hearts Means Caring for the People in the Middle
When we talk about connecting donors with causes, we tend to picture a straight line: money flows from giver to program to person in need. But there are human beings in the middle of that line. Case managers, hotline counselors, shelter staff, outreach workers — people who have chosen, often at significant personal cost, to spend their professional lives in service of others.
They need support too. And right now, they're not getting enough of it.
Jamila Reeves is doing better. She found a therapist, took some time, and eventually returned to the sector in a part-time training role. But she's clear that her burnout wasn't inevitable — it was a predictable outcome of a system that didn't have the resources to sustain the people powering it.
"I needed someone to take care of me so I could take care of them," she says. "That's not too much to ask. It's really not."
It isn't. And if you're someone who gives — or is thinking about giving — it's worth asking whether your generosity can reach all the way to the people making the work possible.